42nd Amendment to the Constitution of India

Oct 13, 2025 by recoveryshake.com 116 views

India's Shift to Parliamentary Form of Government: A Move Towards Accountability

India, a country with a rich history and diverse culture, has undergone significant transformations since its independence in 1947. One of the most notable changes is the shift from a presidential form of government to a parliamentary form of government. This change has been a subject of interest and debate among scholars, politicians, and citizens alike. In this article, we will delve into the reasons behind this shift and explore the implications of this change on the country's governance.

Before we dive into the specifics of India's shift, it is essential to understand the two forms of government in question. A presidential form of government is characterized by a strong head of state who serves as both the head of government and the head of state. The president is elected directly by the people and serves a fixed term. In contrast, a parliamentary form of government is characterized by a head of government who is accountable to the legislature. The head of government is typically the leader of the majority party or coalition in the legislature.

India adopted a presidential form of government at the time of its independence in 1947. However, over the years, the country has undergone significant changes, and the government has been restructured to adopt a parliamentary form of government. The 42nd Amendment to the Constitution of India, which came into effect in 1977, marked a significant shift towards a parliamentary form of government. The amendment introduced the concept of a parliamentary system, where the head of government is accountable to the legislature.

So, why did India shift from a presidential form of government to a parliamentary form of government? There are several reasons behind this shift:

Accountability: One of the primary reasons behind the shift is the need for accountability. In a presidential form of government, the head of state is not accountable to the legislature, which can lead to a lack of transparency and accountability. In a parliamentary form of government, the head of government is accountable to the legislature, which ensures that the government is transparent and accountable to the people.
Stability: A parliamentary form of government is generally more stable than a presidential form of government. In a parliamentary system, the head of government is accountable to the legislature, which ensures that the government is stable and continues to function even in the face of opposition.
Efficiency: A parliamentary form of government is often more efficient than a presidential form of government. In a parliamentary system, the head of government is responsible for the administration of the government, which ensures that the government is efficient and effective in its functioning.

The shift from a presidential form of government to a parliamentary form of government has significant implications for India's governance. Some of the key implications include:

Increased Accountability: The shift towards a parliamentary form of government has ensured that the government is accountable to the people. The head of government is now accountable to the legislature, which ensures that the government is transparent and accountable.
Improved Stability: The shift towards a parliamentary form of government has ensured that the government is stable and continues to function even in the face of opposition. This has helped to maintain stability and continuity in the government.
Enhanced Efficiency: The shift towards a parliamentary form of government has ensured that the government is efficient and effective in its functioning. The head of government is now responsible for the administration of the government, which has helped to improve the efficiency of the government.

In conclusion, India's shift from a presidential form of government to a parliamentary form of government has been a significant change in the country's governance. The shift has ensured that the government is accountable to the people, stable, and efficient. The head of government is now accountable to the legislature, which has helped to maintain transparency and accountability in the government. As India continues to grow and develop, it is essential to maintain this shift and ensure that the government remains accountable, stable, and efficient.

Constitution of India: The Constitution of India is the supreme law of the land and outlines the framework of the government. The Constitution has undergone several amendments since its adoption in 1950.
42nd Amendment to the Constitution of India: The 42nd Amendment to the Constitution of India, which came into effect in 1977, marked a significant shift towards a parliamentary form of government. The amendment introduced the concept of a parliamentary system, where the head of government is accountable to the legislature.
Indian Parliament: The Indian Parliament is the supreme legislative body of the country. The Parliament is composed of two houses: the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha. The Lok Sabha is the lower house of the Parliament, while the Rajya Sabha is the upper house.

What is the difference between a presidential and parliamentary form of government? A presidential form of government is characterized by a strong head of state who serves as both the head of government and the head of state. In contrast, a parliamentary form of government is characterized by a head of government who is accountable to the legislature.
Why did India shift from a presidential form of government to a parliamentary form of government? India shifted from a presidential form of government to a parliamentary form of government to ensure accountability, stability, and efficiency in the government.
What are the implications of the shift towards a parliamentary form of government? The shift towards a parliamentary form of government has ensured that the government is accountable to the people, stable, and efficient. The head of government is now accountable to the legislature, which has helped to maintain transparency and accountability in the government.