Companies should implement effective corporate governance practices

Oct 13, 2025 by recoveryshake.com 97 views

The Effect of Profitability, Family Ownership, and Corporate Governance on Tax Avoidance

Introduction

Tax avoidance is a complex issue that affects companies worldwide, including those in the manufacturing sector. In Indonesia, the mining sector is a significant contributor to the country's economy, and companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) are subject to various tax regulations. This study aims to analyze the effect of profitability, family ownership, and corporate governance on tax avoidance in manufacturing companies in the mining sector listed on the IDX between 2017 and 2019.

Background

Tax avoidance is a strategy used by companies to minimize their tax obligations. This can be influenced by various factors, including profitability, family ownership, and corporate governance. Profitable companies may have more resources to invest in tax avoidance strategies, while family-owned companies may have greater control over decision-making, including tax-related decisions. Corporate governance plays a crucial role in ensuring transparency and accountability in financial statements, which can reduce the possibility of tax avoidance.

Methodology

This study used a non-probability sampling method with a saturated sample type to collect data from 40 mining sector manufacturing companies listed on the IDX between 2017 and 2019. The data analysis process was carried out using SPSS version 25 software. The independent variables analyzed were profitability, family ownership, institutional ownership, independent commissioner, and audit committee, while the dependent variable observed was tax avoidance, measured using Cash Effective Tax Rate (CETR).

Results

The results of the analysis showed that profitability, family ownership, institutional ownership, and corporate governance did not have a simultaneous influence on tax avoidance. However, when analyzed partially, only family ownership showed an influence on tax avoidance, while profitability, institutional ownership, and corporate governance had no effect.

Discussion

The results of this study provide important insights into the dynamics of tax avoidance in the mining sector in Indonesia. Family ownership was found to have a significant influence on tax avoidance, which may be due to the greater control that family-owned companies have over decision-making, including tax-related decisions. This suggests that family-owned companies may be more aggressive in tax strategies to protect family long-term interests and increase company value.

On the other hand, high profitability was not found to be directly proportional to tax avoidance. This may be caused by the fact that more profitable companies are often under tighter supervision by regulators, so they tend to choose to comply with applicable tax provisions. Additionally, tax avoidance can potentially harm a company's reputation, which is a consideration for companies with high profitability not to be involved in the practice of tax avoidance that can damage their image in the public's eyes and stakeholders.

Corporate governance plays an important role in the management and transparency of financial statements. A good governance mechanism can reduce the possibility of tax avoidance, as stakeholders have greater access to company information, which encourages accountability. However, this study shows that in the context of the company under study, corporate governance does not show a significant effect on tax avoidance. This may be caused by the lack of implementation of effective corporate governance practices in these companies.

Conclusion

The results of this study provide important insights for investors, stakeholders, and regulators related to the dynamics of tax avoidance in the mining sector in Indonesia. By understanding the factors that influence tax avoidance, companies can implement better strategies in their governance and tax management, as well as increasing compliance with applicable tax regulations.

Recommendations

Based on the findings of this study, the following recommendations are made:

Family-owned companies should be more transparent in their tax practices: Family-owned companies should be more transparent in their tax practices, as this can help to reduce the possibility of tax avoidance.
Companies should implement effective corporate governance practices: Companies should implement effective corporate governance practices, as this can help to reduce the possibility of tax avoidance and increase transparency and accountability.
Regulators should monitor tax practices more closely: Regulators should monitor tax practices more closely, as this can help to prevent tax avoidance and ensure that companies comply with applicable tax regulations.

Limitations

This study has several limitations, including:

Limited sample size: The sample size of this study was limited to 40 mining sector manufacturing companies listed on the IDX between 2017 and 2019.
Non-probability sampling method: The non-probability sampling method used in this study may not be representative of the entire population of mining sector manufacturing companies listed on the IDX.
Limited data analysis: The data analysis process used in this study was limited to the analysis of profitability, family ownership, institutional ownership, independent commissioner, and audit committee, as well as tax avoidance, measured using Cash Effective Tax Rate (CETR).

Future Research Directions

Future research should aim to:

Examine the effect of other factors on tax avoidance: Future research should examine the effect of other factors, such as industry, company size, and management quality, on tax avoidance.
Use a larger sample size: Future research should use a larger sample size to increase the representativeness of the findings.
Use a more advanced data analysis method: Future research should use a more advanced data analysis method, such as regression analysis, to examine the relationship between the independent variables and tax avoidance.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study provides important insights into the dynamics of tax avoidance in the mining sector in Indonesia. The findings of this study suggest that family ownership has a significant influence on tax avoidance, while profitability, institutional ownership, and corporate governance have no effect. The results of this study provide important implications for investors, stakeholders, and regulators related to the dynamics of tax avoidance in the mining sector in Indonesia.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about the Effect of Profitability, Family Ownership, and Corporate Governance on Tax Avoidance

Q: What is tax avoidance, and how does it affect companies?

A: Tax avoidance is a strategy used by companies to minimize their tax obligations. While tax avoidance is not the same as tax evasion, it can still have negative consequences for companies, including damage to their reputation and potential penalties from regulatory authorities.

Q: What is the significance of family ownership in tax avoidance?

A: Family ownership can play a significant role in tax avoidance, as family-owned companies may have greater control over decision-making, including tax-related decisions. This can lead to more aggressive tax strategies to protect family long-term interests and increase company value.

Q: How does profitability affect tax avoidance?

A: High profitability is not always directly proportional to tax avoidance. More profitable companies may be under tighter supervision by regulators, so they tend to choose to comply with applicable tax provisions. Additionally, tax avoidance can potentially harm a company's reputation, which is a consideration for companies with high profitability not to be involved in the practice of tax avoidance that can damage their image in the public's eyes and stakeholders.

Q: What is the role of corporate governance in tax avoidance?

A: Corporate governance plays an important role in the management and transparency of financial statements. A good governance mechanism can reduce the possibility of tax avoidance, as stakeholders have greater access to company information, which encourages accountability.

Q: What are the implications of this study for investors, stakeholders, and regulators?

A: The findings of this study provide important implications for investors, stakeholders, and regulators related to the dynamics of tax avoidance in the mining sector in Indonesia. By understanding the factors that influence tax avoidance, companies can implement better strategies in their governance and tax management, as well as increasing compliance with applicable tax regulations.

Q: What are the limitations of this study?

A: This study has several limitations, including:

Limited sample size: The sample size of this study was limited to 40 mining sector manufacturing companies listed on the IDX between 2017 and 2019.
Non-probability sampling method: The non-probability sampling method used in this study may not be representative of the entire population of mining sector manufacturing companies listed on the IDX.
Limited data analysis: The data analysis process used in this study was limited to the analysis of profitability, family ownership, institutional ownership, independent commissioner, and audit committee, as well as tax avoidance, measured using Cash Effective Tax Rate (CETR).

Q: What are the future research directions?

A: Future research should aim to:

Examine the effect of other factors on tax avoidance: Future research should examine the effect of other factors, such as industry, company size, and management quality, on tax avoidance.
Use a larger sample size: Future research should use a larger sample size to increase the representativeness of the findings.
Use a more advanced data analysis method: Future research should use a more advanced data analysis method, such as regression analysis, to examine the relationship between the independent variables and tax avoidance.

Q: What are the practical implications of this study for companies?

A: The findings of this study provide important practical implications for companies, including:

Family-owned companies should be more transparent in their tax practices: Family-owned companies should be more transparent in their tax practices, as this can help to reduce the possibility of tax avoidance.
Companies should implement effective corporate governance practices: Companies should implement effective corporate governance practices, as this can help to reduce the possibility of tax avoidance and increase transparency and accountability.
Regulators should monitor tax practices more closely: Regulators should monitor tax practices more closely, as this can help to prevent tax avoidance and ensure that companies comply with applicable tax regulations.

Q: What are the policy implications of this study for regulators?

A: The findings of this study provide important policy implications for regulators, including:

Regulators should develop more effective tax regulations: Regulators should develop more effective tax regulations that take into account the complexities of tax avoidance in the mining sector.
Regulators should increase transparency and accountability: Regulators should increase transparency and accountability in the tax practices of companies, as this can help to prevent tax avoidance and ensure that companies comply with applicable tax regulations.
Regulators should provide more support for companies: Regulators should provide more support for companies, including training and education, to help them comply with tax regulations and avoid tax avoidance.