Consideration of the Panel of Judges

Oct 13, 2025 by recoveryshake.com 19 views

Analysis of Constitutional Court Decision No. 93/PUU-X/2012 on the Resolution of Islamic Banking Disputes in Indonesia

In the realm of Islamic banking in Indonesia, the resolution of disputes has been a pressing issue. The presence of multiple forums, such as Basyarnas, Religious Courts, and District Courts, has created a complex landscape, with overlapping authorities leading to legal uncertainty. However, the Constitutional Court's Decision No. 93/PUU-X/2012 has brought clarity to this issue, emphasizing that the explanation of Article 52 paragraph (2) of Law No. 21 of 2008 concerning Islamic Banking is contrary to the 1945 Constitution and lacks binding legal force. This decision has significant implications, as it appoints the Religious Court as the sole institution authorized to prosecute disputes over Islamic banking.

Background and Analysis

The decision of the Constitutional Court was a response to the fundamental legal issue of unclear regulations in Islamic banking. The lack of clarity has resulted in confusion among practitioners and parties involved in Islamic banking transactions. Therefore, this decision not only brings clarity but also provides a strong legal basis for dispute resolution in this field. The Constitutional Court's decision has been a turning point in the resolution of Islamic banking disputes, as it has provided a clear framework for the Religious Court to take over the authority in resolving these disputes.

Consideration of the Panel of Judges

The Panel of Judges in Decision No. 93/PUU-X/2012 considered that the explanation of Article 55 paragraph (2) is not only not binding but also not in line with the principles of the constitution. This consideration is the foundation for the Religious Court to take over the authority in resolving Islamic banking disputes. With this affirmation, it is expected to reduce legal uncertainty that previously disrupted the interests of the parties. The Panel of Judges' consideration has been a crucial factor in the decision, as it has provided a clear understanding of the constitutionality of the explanation of Article 55 paragraph (2).

Legal Consequences

After the decision, the legal consequences produced are the choice of non-litigation dispute resolution forums to be clearer. This settlement forum includes various methods such as consultation, negotiation, and mediation, which can be used if agreed by the parties. It is essential to note that the authority of the District Court in resolving Islamic banking disputes becomes invalid, thereby strengthening the position of the Religious Courts. The legal consequences of the decision have been significant, as they have provided a clear framework for the resolution of Islamic banking disputes.

Readiness of the Religious Court

Interestingly, the Religious Court in Indonesia is quite ready in resolving Islamic banking disputes. They have been equipped with legal instruments and regulations that support their duties. In addition, institutions such as the Religious Courts, Bank Indonesia, the Supreme Court, and the Judicial Commission actively provide training to judges of the Religious Courts. This aims to increase their understanding of sharia and economic law. The Religious Court's readiness has been a crucial factor in the decision, as it has provided a clear understanding of their ability to resolve Islamic banking disputes.

Conclusion and Recommendations

In conclusion, this research recommends the need for a revision of Article 55 of Law No. 21 of 2008 to avoid overlapping authority which can cause legal confusion. The parties involved in the Islamic banking sector, such as Islamic banks, customers, and notaries, are advised to elect a Religious Court as a dispute resolution forum. This was done after the deliberation efforts did not produce results. With these steps, it is expected that the sharia banking dispute resolution system in Indonesia can run more effectively and transparently, providing legal certainty needed by all parties involved.

Recommendations for Future Research

Future research should focus on the implementation of the decision and its impact on the resolution of Islamic banking disputes. Additionally, research should be conducted on the readiness of the Religious Court in resolving Islamic banking disputes and the effectiveness of the training provided to judges of the Religious Courts. Furthermore, research should be conducted on the revision of Article 55 of Law No. 21 of 2008 to avoid overlapping authority which can cause legal confusion.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the Constitutional Court's Decision No. 93/PUU-X/2012 has brought clarity to the resolution of Islamic banking disputes in Indonesia. The decision has appointed the Religious Court as the sole institution authorized to prosecute disputes over Islamic banking, and has provided a clear framework for the resolution of these disputes. The decision has significant implications, as it has reduced legal uncertainty and provided a strong legal basis for dispute resolution in this field.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on Constitutional Court Decision No. 93/PUU-X/2012 on the Resolution of Islamic Banking Disputes in Indonesia

The Constitutional Court's Decision No. 93/PUU-X/2012 has been a significant development in the resolution of Islamic banking disputes in Indonesia. However, there are still many questions and concerns surrounding this decision. In this article, we will address some of the frequently asked questions (FAQs) on this topic.

Q: What is the significance of Constitutional Court Decision No. 93/PUU-X/2012?

A: The decision is significant because it clarifies the authority of the Religious Court in resolving Islamic banking disputes. The decision also emphasizes that the explanation of Article 52 paragraph (2) of Law No. 21 of 2008 concerning Islamic Banking is contrary to the 1945 Constitution and lacks binding legal force.

Q: What is the impact of the decision on the resolution of Islamic banking disputes?

A: The decision has reduced legal uncertainty and provided a clear framework for the resolution of Islamic banking disputes. The decision has also appointed the Religious Court as the sole institution authorized to prosecute disputes over Islamic banking.

Q: What are the legal consequences of the decision?

A: The legal consequences of the decision are the choice of non-litigation dispute resolution forums to be clearer. This settlement forum includes various methods such as consultation, negotiation, and mediation, which can be used if agreed by the parties. The authority of the District Court in resolving Islamic banking disputes becomes invalid, thereby strengthening the position of the Religious Courts.

Q: Is the Religious Court ready to resolve Islamic banking disputes?

A: Yes, the Religious Court in Indonesia is quite ready in resolving Islamic banking disputes. They have been equipped with legal instruments and regulations that support their duties. In addition, institutions such as the Religious Courts, Bank Indonesia, the Supreme Court, and the Judicial Commission actively provide training to judges of the Religious Courts.

Q: What are the recommendations for future research?

A: Future research should focus on the implementation of the decision and its impact on the resolution of Islamic banking disputes. Additionally, research should be conducted on the readiness of the Religious Court in resolving Islamic banking disputes and the effectiveness of the training provided to judges of the Religious Courts. Furthermore, research should be conducted on the revision of Article 55 of Law No. 21 of 2008 to avoid overlapping authority which can cause legal confusion.

Q: What are the implications of the decision for the Islamic banking sector?

A: The decision has significant implications for the Islamic banking sector. The decision has provided a clear framework for the resolution of Islamic banking disputes, which can increase the confidence of customers and investors in the sector. The decision has also emphasized the importance of sharia compliance in Islamic banking, which can promote the development of the sector.

Q: What are the next steps for the implementation of the decision?

A: The next steps for the implementation of the decision are the revision of Article 55 of Law No. 21 of 2008 to avoid overlapping authority which can cause legal confusion. The parties involved in the Islamic banking sector, such as Islamic banks, customers, and notaries, should elect a Religious Court as a dispute resolution forum. This was done after the deliberation efforts did not produce results.

Q: What are the benefits of the decision for the Indonesian economy?

A: The decision has significant benefits for the Indonesian economy. The decision has promoted the development of the Islamic banking sector, which can increase the confidence of customers and investors in the sector. The decision has also emphasized the importance of sharia compliance in Islamic banking, which can promote the development of the sector and increase the competitiveness of Indonesian banks in the global market.

Q: What are the challenges facing the implementation of the decision?

A: The challenges facing the implementation of the decision are the revision of Article 55 of Law No. 21 of 2008 to avoid overlapping authority which can cause legal confusion. The parties involved in the Islamic banking sector, such as Islamic banks, customers, and notaries, may face difficulties in electing a Religious Court as a dispute resolution forum. Additionally, the Religious Court may face challenges in resolving Islamic banking disputes, particularly in cases where the parties have different interpretations of sharia law.