Increase the role of leadership

Oct 13, 2025 by recoveryshake.com 13 views

Determinants of Work Motivation Staff Puskesmas during the Covid-19 Pandemic Period at Kebun Lada Puskesmas, North Binjai District, Binjai City in 2021

Introduction

The Covid-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on various sectors of life, including the healthcare industry. Kebun Lada Puskesmas in North Binjai District, Binjai City, was not immune to the effects of the pandemic. The decline in the performance of staff at the Puskesmas is a pressing concern, and one of the primary factors contributing to this decline is low work motivation. Understanding the determinants of work motivation is crucial in creating a conducive work environment that can improve the performance and contribution of staff in providing optimal health services for the community.

Background

The Covid-19 pandemic has put immense pressure on the healthcare sector, including Puskesmas. The pandemic has led to a significant increase in workload, stress, and burnout among healthcare workers. Low work motivation is a significant concern in the healthcare sector, as it can lead to decreased productivity, poor job satisfaction, and increased turnover rates. Identifying the determinants of work motivation is essential in developing strategies to improve work motivation and overall performance.

Methodology

This study used Herzberg's theory to analyze the factors that influence the work motivation of the Puskesmas Lada Puskesmas staff in 2021. Quantitative research methods with a cross-sectional approach were applied to collect data from 47 staff, using questionnaires and puskesmas profiles. Data analysis was carried out using the Chi Square statistical test, both univariate and bivariate.

Results

The results show that the majority of the staff at the pepper plantation puskesmas are over 40 years old (44.2%), have academy/college education (86%), have worked more than 15 years (53.5%), and are married (76.7%). Several determinants were found to be significantly related to work motivation, including:

Responsibility (p = 0.001): Staff who feel greater responsibilities in work tend to be more motivated.
Interpersonal relationship (p = 0.001): Harmonious working atmosphere and good relations between staff can increase morale.
Working Environment (P = 0.001): A comfortable, safe, and supportive work environment can increase productivity.
Reward (p = 0.01): A fair appreciation system and in accordance with performance can motivate staff to excel.
Leadership Role (p = 0.024): Inspirational, supportive, and visionary leadership is able to motivate staff to achieve common goals.

Discussion

The findings of this study highlight the importance of internal and external factors in determining work motivation. Responsibility, interpersonal relationship, working environment, reward, and leadership role are all significant determinants of work motivation. These findings are consistent with Herzberg's theory, which suggests that job satisfaction and motivation are influenced by a combination of intrinsic and extrinsic factors.

Conclusion

This study provides valuable insights into the determinants of work motivation among Puskesmas staff during the Covid-19 pandemic period. The findings suggest that improving the reward system, increasing responsibility, increasing the role of leadership, improving interpersonal relationships, and improving the work environment are all essential in creating a conducive work environment that can improve the performance and contribution of staff in providing optimal health services for the community.

Recommendations

Based on the findings of this study, the following recommendations are made:

Improve the reward system: Give a more fair and balanced appreciation with performance, such as bonuses, promotion, and opportunities for self-development.
Increase responsibility: Provide opportunities for staff to take a greater role in decision making and program implementation.
Increase the role of leadership: Building inspirational, supportive, and visionary leadership that is able to motivate and provide clear direction to staff.
Improve interpersonal relationships: Fostering a harmonious and positive working atmosphere by building effective communication and activities that strengthen a sense of togetherness between staff.
Improve the work environment: Creating a comfortable, safe, and supportive work environment, for example by providing adequate facilities, organizing more ergonomic workspaces, and managing work stress.

By paying attention to the factors that affect work motivation, the Puskesmas Kebun Lada can create a conducive work environment to improve the performance and contribution of staff in providing optimal health services for the community, especially in the midst of challenging pandemic situations.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Determinants of Work Motivation Staff Puskesmas during the Covid-19 Pandemic Period

Q: What is the main concern of the study?

A: The main concern of the study is to identify the determinants of work motivation among Puskesmas staff during the Covid-19 pandemic period.

Q: What is the significance of understanding work motivation?

A: Understanding work motivation is crucial in creating a conducive work environment that can improve the performance and contribution of staff in providing optimal health services for the community.

Q: What are the determinants of work motivation identified in the study?

A: The determinants of work motivation identified in the study are:

Responsibility (p = 0.001): Staff who feel greater responsibilities in work tend to be more motivated.
Interpersonal relationship (p = 0.001): Harmonious working atmosphere and good relations between staff can increase morale.
Working Environment (P = 0.001): A comfortable, safe, and supportive work environment can increase productivity.
Reward (p = 0.01): A fair appreciation system and in accordance with performance can motivate staff to excel.
Leadership Role (p = 0.024): Inspirational, supportive, and visionary leadership is able to motivate staff to achieve common goals.

Q: What are the implications of the study?

A: The study highlights the importance of internal and external factors in determining work motivation. The findings suggest that improving the reward system, increasing responsibility, increasing the role of leadership, improving interpersonal relationships, and improving the work environment are all essential in creating a conducive work environment that can improve the performance and contribution of staff in providing optimal health services for the community.

Q: What are the recommendations of the study?

A: The study recommends the following:

Improve the reward system: Give a more fair and balanced appreciation with performance, such as bonuses, promotion, and opportunities for self-development.
Increase responsibility: Provide opportunities for staff to take a greater role in decision making and program implementation.
Increase the role of leadership: Building inspirational, supportive, and visionary leadership that is able to motivate and provide clear direction to staff.
Improve interpersonal relationships: Fostering a harmonious and positive working atmosphere by building effective communication and activities that strengthen a sense of togetherness between staff.
Improve the work environment: Creating a comfortable, safe, and supportive work environment, for example by providing adequate facilities, organizing more ergonomic workspaces, and managing work stress.

Q: What are the limitations of the study?

A: The study has several limitations, including:

Small sample size: The study only collected data from 47 staff, which may not be representative of the entire Puskesmas staff.
Cross-sectional design: The study used a cross-sectional design, which may not capture the dynamic nature of work motivation.
Self-reported data: The study relied on self-reported data, which may be subject to biases and errors.

Q: What are the future directions of the study?

A: The study suggests several future directions, including:

Longitudinal study: Conducting a longitudinal study to examine the changes in work motivation over time.
Qualitative study: Conducting a qualitative study to gain a deeper understanding of the experiences and perspectives of Puskesmas staff.
Intervention study: Conducting an intervention study to test the effectiveness of the recommendations made in the study.