The Background to the Constitutional Crisis

Oct 13, 2025 by recoveryshake.com 85 views

The Kansas Constitutional Crisis of 1856: A Clash of Two Competing Constitutions

Introduction

The Kansas constitutional crisis of 1856 was a pivotal moment in American history, marking a significant turning point in the debate over slavery in the United States. The crisis arose from the simultaneous attempts by pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions to establish a constitution for the newly formed Kansas Territory. This article will examine the two competing constitutions and determine which statement best describes their provisions regarding slavery.

The Background to the Constitutional Crisis

In 1854, the Kansas-Nebraska Act repealed the Missouri Compromise, which had prohibited slavery in the Louisiana Territory north of the 36°30' parallel. The Kansas-Nebraska Act allowed the residents of the Kansas and Nebraska territories to decide for themselves whether to allow slavery within their borders. This led to a massive influx of settlers, including pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions, who sought to influence the outcome of the territorial elections and the drafting of the constitution.

The Pro-Slavery Constitution

The pro-slavery faction, also known as the "Border Ruffians," was largely composed of Missourians who had settled in Kansas. They were determined to establish a constitution that would allow slavery in the territory. The pro-slavery constitution, also known as the "Lecompton Constitution," was drafted in 1857 and was designed to ensure the dominance of the pro-slavery faction in the territory.

The Lecompton Constitution allowed slavery in Kansas, but it also included provisions that would have allowed the territory to be admitted to the Union as a slave state. The constitution also included a provision that would have allowed the territory to be divided into two separate territories, one of which would have been a slave state and the other a free state.

The Anti-Slavery Constitution

The anti-slavery faction, also known as the "Free State Party," was composed of settlers who opposed the expansion of slavery into Kansas. They were determined to establish a constitution that would prohibit slavery in the territory. The anti-slavery constitution, also known as the "Topeka Constitution," was drafted in 1855 and was designed to ensure the dominance of the anti-slavery faction in the territory.

The Topeka Constitution prohibited slavery in Kansas and also included provisions that would have allowed the territory to be admitted to the Union as a free state. The constitution also included a provision that would have allowed the territory to be divided into two separate territories, one of which would have been a free state and the other a slave state.

Comparison of the Two Constitutions

A comparison of the two constitutions reveals significant differences in their provisions regarding slavery. The Lecompton Constitution allowed slavery in Kansas, while the Topeka Constitution prohibited it. The Lecompton Constitution also included provisions that would have allowed the territory to be admitted to the Union as a slave state, while the Topeka Constitution included provisions that would have allowed the territory to be admitted to the Union as a free state.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the two competing constitutions in Kansas in 1856 had significant differences in their provisions regarding slavery. The Lecompton Constitution allowed slavery in Kansas, while the Topeka Constitution prohibited it. The Lecompton Constitution also included provisions that would have allowed the territory to be admitted to the Union as a slave state, while the Topeka Constitution included provisions that would have allowed the territory to be admitted to the Union as a free state.

Which statement best describes the two competing constitutions in Kansas in 1856?

A. Neither constitution agreed on the subject of making slavery legal. B. Both constitutions allowed slavery in Kansas for property owners. C. Neither constitution was pro-slavery.

The correct answer is C. Neither constitution was pro-slavery. While the Lecompton Constitution allowed slavery in Kansas, the Topeka Constitution prohibited it. Therefore, neither constitution was pro-slavery.

References

The Kansas-Nebraska Act. (1854). Retrieved from https://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?flash=true&doc=29
The Lecompton Constitution. (1857). Retrieved from https://www.kshs.org/p/kansas-territorial-constitution-of-1857/15555
The Topeka Constitution. (1855). Retrieved from https://www.kshs.org/p/kansas-territorial-constitution-of-1855/15554
The Kansas Constitutional Crisis of 1856. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.history.com/topics/us-states/kansas-constitutional-crisis