The Importance of Tidar Gerindra in the 2013 Pilgubsu

Oct 13, 2025 by recoveryshake.com 70 views

Introduction

The 2013 Pilgubsu (Pilgub Sumatera Utara) election in Medan City was a highly contested event, with various parties vying for the top spot. Among these parties was the Gerindra Party, which, through its organization's wing, Tunas Indonesia Raya (Tidar), played a crucial role in developing an effective winning strategy. This article aims to explore the role of Tidar Gerindra in winning Gus Irawan Pasaribu in the 2013 Pilgubsu in Medan City.

The Importance of Tidar Gerindra in the 2013 Pilgubsu

Although the Gerindra Party in North Sumatra was still considered a small party, with only three seats in the DPRD, the existence of Tidar played a significant role in developing an effective winning strategy. Tidar, as a Gerindra wing organization, focused on increasing voter participation and creating positive public opinion towards Gus Irawan Pasaribu. This was crucial, considering the socio-political condition in North Sumatra, which was still greatly influenced by personal closeness and emotional ties to candidates.

Tidar's Political Communication Strategy

Tidar's political communication strategy was oriented towards raising support from the community who tend not to vote (white voters) and novice voters. This was achieved through a proactive approach, where Tidar organized the cultural network of people in North Sumatra, trying to build effective communication with voters. Giving an understanding of politics, especially for voter groups who are rarely involved in the election process, was one of their main focuses. Tidar realized that if this voter group could be reached and involved, the potential to reach significant votes would increase.

Data Analysis and Findings

Data analysis obtained from interviews with informants and literature studies showed that Tidar was making systematic efforts in conducting socialization and campaigns. By utilizing the strength of interpersonalia communication and using social media, they tried to reach a wider community. This approach not only aimed to attract votes but also to build political trust and awareness in the community.

The Impact of Tidar's Efforts on the Election Results

Referring to the survey results conducted by political consultants and survey institutions that worked with Gus Irawan Pasaribu, it was found that the support of novice voters and non-voters groups had a significant impact on the final election results. Tidar's success in building networks and influencing public opinion greatly contributed to the position of Gus Irawan Pasaribu in the 2013 Pilgubsu contestation.

Conclusion

Tidar not only functions as a party wing but also as an agent of change that plays a role in encouraging community political participation. Their efforts in creating an environment that supported Gus Irawan Pasaribu showed how important the appropriate communication strategy was in winning the votes of voters. The active role of Tidar in winning Gus Irawan Pasaribu in the 2013 Pilgubsu in Medan is a concrete example of how an organization can affect the dynamics of political and community participation in elections.

Recommendations

Based on the findings of this study, the following recommendations can be made:

Increase voter participation: Tidar's efforts in increasing voter participation and creating positive public opinion towards Gus Irawan Pasaribu can be replicated in future elections.
Utilize social media: Tidar's use of social media to reach a wider community can be an effective strategy in future elections.
Build political trust and awareness: Tidar's efforts in building political trust and awareness in the community can be an effective way to increase voter participation and support for candidates.

Limitations of the Study

This study has several limitations, including:

Limited scope: The study only focused on the 2013 Pilgubsu election in Medan City and did not explore other elections or contexts.
Data collection: The study relied on interviews with informants and literature studies, which may not provide a comprehensive understanding of Tidar's efforts.
Generalizability: The findings of this study may not be generalizable to other contexts or elections.

Future Research Directions

Future research can build on this study by:

Exploring other contexts: Future research can explore Tidar's efforts in other elections or contexts to see if the findings of this study can be replicated.
Using different data collection methods: Future research can use different data collection methods, such as surveys or experiments, to provide a more comprehensive understanding of Tidar's efforts.
Investigating the impact of Tidar's efforts on voter behavior: Future research can investigate the impact of Tidar's efforts on voter behavior, such as voter turnout and voting patterns.
Q&A: The Role of Tidar Gerindra in Winning Gus Irawan Pasaribu in the 2013 Pilgubsu in Medan City =====================================================================================

Introduction

The 2013 Pilgubsu (Pilgub Sumatera Utara) election in Medan City was a highly contested event, with various parties vying for the top spot. Among these parties was the Gerindra Party, which, through its organization's wing, Tunas Indonesia Raya (Tidar), played a crucial role in developing an effective winning strategy. In this Q&A article, we will explore the role of Tidar Gerindra in winning Gus Irawan Pasaribu in the 2013 Pilgubsu in Medan City.

Q: What is Tidar Gerindra and what is its role in the Gerindra Party?

A: Tidar Gerindra is the organization's wing of the Gerindra Party, which focuses on increasing voter participation and creating positive public opinion towards the party's candidates. In the 2013 Pilgubsu election, Tidar played a crucial role in developing an effective winning strategy for Gus Irawan Pasaribu.

Q: What was the main focus of Tidar's political communication strategy in the 2013 Pilgubsu election?

A: The main focus of Tidar's political communication strategy was to raise support from the community who tend not to vote (white voters) and novice voters. This was achieved through a proactive approach, where Tidar organized the cultural network of people in North Sumatra, trying to build effective communication with voters.

Q: How did Tidar utilize social media in the 2013 Pilgubsu election?

A: Tidar utilized social media to reach a wider community and build political trust and awareness in the community. They used social media platforms to share information about Gus Irawan Pasaribu and the Gerindra Party's platform, and to engage with voters and build relationships with them.

Q: What was the impact of Tidar's efforts on the election results?

A: The survey results conducted by political consultants and survey institutions that worked with Gus Irawan Pasaribu showed that the support of novice voters and non-voters groups had a significant impact on the final election results. Tidar's success in building networks and influencing public opinion greatly contributed to the position of Gus Irawan Pasaribu in the 2013 Pilgubsu contestation.

Q: What can be learned from Tidar's efforts in the 2013 Pilgubsu election?

A: Tidar's efforts in the 2013 Pilgubsu election can be seen as a model for effective political communication and voter engagement. By focusing on building relationships with voters and creating positive public opinion, Tidar was able to increase voter participation and support for Gus Irawan Pasaribu.

Q: What are the limitations of this study?

A: This study has several limitations, including:

Limited scope: The study only focused on the 2013 Pilgubsu election in Medan City and did not explore other elections or contexts.
Data collection: The study relied on interviews with informants and literature studies, which may not provide a comprehensive understanding of Tidar's efforts.
Generalizability: The findings of this study may not be generalizable to other contexts or elections.

Q: What are the future research directions for this study?

A: Future research can build on this study by:

Exploring other contexts: Future research can explore Tidar's efforts in other elections or contexts to see if the findings of this study can be replicated.
Using different data collection methods: Future research can use different data collection methods, such as surveys or experiments, to provide a more comprehensive understanding of Tidar's efforts.
Investigating the impact of Tidar's efforts on voter behavior: Future research can investigate the impact of Tidar's efforts on voter behavior, such as voter turnout and voting patterns.

Conclusion

The role of Tidar Gerindra in winning Gus Irawan Pasaribu in the 2013 Pilgubsu in Medan City is a crucial aspect of the election. By focusing on building relationships with voters and creating positive public opinion, Tidar was able to increase voter participation and support for Gus Irawan Pasaribu. This study provides valuable insights into the role of Tidar Gerindra in the 2013 Pilgubsu election and highlights the importance of effective political communication and voter engagement in elections.