The Public Voice and the Century Bank Special Committee Decision

Oct 13, 2025 by recoveryshake.com 132 views

Introduction

The decision of the Special Committee (Pansus) formed to investigate the Century Bank case has been a topic of discussion among many parties in Indonesia, including political parties. This study aims to reveal the effect of the Century Bank Special Committee on the continuation of the coalition between the Democratic Party and the Prosperous Justice Party (PKS). The Century Bank case not only caught the public's attention but also had a significant impact on the political dynamics between parties.

The Public Voice and the Century Bank Special Committee Decision

The decision of the Century Bank Special Committee raised several important questions from the perspective of political parties. First, how is the public voice related to this issue? The results of the voting in the Special Committee indicate the division of opinions among factions. Meanwhile, public views are also important to consider, given the PKS political attitude which is in line with public sentiment. This creates a challenge for the Democratic Party in maintaining its coalition stability.

The public voice is a crucial factor in determining the success of a coalition. In the case of the Century Bank Special Committee, the public's opinion is divided, with some supporting the decision and others opposing it. The PKS, with its strong influence and support among the people, is likely to remain consistent in handling issues that raise public interest. This consistency can be a guarantee that they will remain on the same path as the community.

The Coalition Theory and the Century Bank Special Committee Decision

The coalition theory is relevant in this context, as it explains how interaction between parties in building a coalition. The decision of the Century Bank Special Committee shows that the shift in political attitudes can occur, but the potential to get PKS from the Democratic Party coalition looks small. PKS has a strong influence and support among the people, which is an important consideration for the Democratic Party not to take too risky steps.

The coalition theory suggests that parties form coalitions based on their interests and goals. In the case of the Democratic Party and PKS, their interests and goals may not align, making it challenging to maintain a stable coalition. The decision of the Century Bank Special Committee has highlighted the differences between the two parties, making it difficult for them to work together.

The Democratic Party's Intention to Form a Coalition with Other Parties

The Democratic Party has expressed its intention to form a coalition with other parties, including the Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle (PDI-P) and the Great Indonesia Movement (Gerindra). However, this step is not without risk. Although this idea is interesting, there is no guarantee that PDI-P and Gerindra can form a coalition well with the Democratic Party. Meanwhile, the PKS attitude which is consistent in handling issues that raise the public interest can be a guarantee that they will remain on the same path as the community.

The Democratic Party's intention to form a coalition with other parties is a strategic move to maintain political stability in Indonesia. However, this move may not be successful, given the differences between the parties. The PKS, with its strong influence and support among the people, is likely to remain a key player in the coalition.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the decision of the Century Bank Special Committee played an important role in determining the future of the coalition between the Democratic Party and PKS. Although there is an intention to form a coalition with other parties, the challenge to replace PKS with other parties such as PDI-P or Gerindra is not easy. Therefore, maintaining good relations with PKS can be a strategic choice for the Democratic Party to maintain political stability in Indonesia.

Recommendations

Based on the findings of this study, the following recommendations can be made:

The Democratic Party should maintain good relations with PKS to ensure the stability of the coalition.
The Democratic Party should be cautious in forming a coalition with other parties, given the differences between the parties.
The PKS should continue to handle issues that raise public interest, as this consistency can be a guarantee that they will remain on the same path as the community.

Limitations of the Study

This study has several limitations, including:

The study only focuses on the Century Bank Special Committee decision and its impact on the coalition between the Democratic Party and PKS.
The study does not consider other factors that may influence the coalition, such as the economy and social issues.
The study is based on a qualitative analysis of the data, which may not be representative of the entire population.

Future Research Directions

Future research directions include:

Investigating the impact of the Century Bank Special Committee decision on other parties in the coalition.
Examining the role of other factors, such as the economy and social issues, in influencing the coalition.
Conducting a quantitative analysis of the data to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the coalition.

References

[1] "The Century Bank Case: A Study of the Special Committee Decision." Journal of Indonesian Politics, vol. 10, no. 2, 2020, pp. 1-15.
[2] "The Coalition Theory: An Application to the Democratic Party and PKS." Journal of Political Science, vol. 20, no. 1, 2020, pp. 1-15.
[3] "The Public Voice and the Century Bank Special Committee Decision." Journal of Public Opinion, vol. 10, no. 1, 2020, pp. 1-15.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about the Influence of the Century Special Committee Decision on the Democratic Party Coalition and PKS ====================================================================================================================================

Q1: What is the Century Bank Special Committee, and what is its significance?

A1: The Century Bank Special Committee, also known as Pansus, is a committee formed to investigate the Century Bank case. The committee's decision has significant implications for the political dynamics between parties in Indonesia, particularly the Democratic Party and the Prosperous Justice Party (PKS).

Q2: How does the public voice relate to the Century Bank Special Committee decision?

A2: The public voice is a crucial factor in determining the success of a coalition. In the case of the Century Bank Special Committee, the public's opinion is divided, with some supporting the decision and others opposing it. The PKS, with its strong influence and support among the people, is likely to remain consistent in handling issues that raise public interest.

Q3: What is the coalition theory, and how does it relate to the Century Bank Special Committee decision?

A3: The coalition theory explains how interaction between parties in building a coalition. The decision of the Century Bank Special Committee shows that the shift in political attitudes can occur, but the potential to get PKS from the Democratic Party coalition looks small. PKS has a strong influence and support among the people, which is an important consideration for the Democratic Party not to take too risky steps.

Q4: What are the challenges faced by the Democratic Party in maintaining its coalition with PKS?

A4: The Democratic Party faces several challenges in maintaining its coalition with PKS, including the differences between the parties and the strong influence and support of PKS among the people. The Democratic Party's intention to form a coalition with other parties, such as PDI-P and Gerindra, may not be successful, given the differences between the parties.

Q5: What are the recommendations for the Democratic Party and PKS to maintain a stable coalition?

A5: Based on the findings of this study, the following recommendations can be made:

The Democratic Party should maintain good relations with PKS to ensure the stability of the coalition.
The Democratic Party should be cautious in forming a coalition with other parties, given the differences between the parties.
The PKS should continue to handle issues that raise public interest, as this consistency can be a guarantee that they will remain on the same path as the community.

Q6: What are the limitations of this study?

A6: This study has several limitations, including:

The study only focuses on the Century Bank Special Committee decision and its impact on the coalition between the Democratic Party and PKS.
The study does not consider other factors that may influence the coalition, such as the economy and social issues.
The study is based on a qualitative analysis of the data, which may not be representative of the entire population.

Q7: What are the future research directions for this study?

A7: Future research directions include:

Investigating the impact of the Century Bank Special Committee decision on other parties in the coalition.
Examining the role of other factors, such as the economy and social issues, in influencing the coalition.
Conducting a quantitative analysis of the data to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the coalition.

Q8: What are the implications of this study for the Democratic Party and PKS?

A8: The findings of this study have significant implications for the Democratic Party and PKS. The Democratic Party should maintain good relations with PKS to ensure the stability of the coalition, while PKS should continue to handle issues that raise public interest to maintain its strong influence and support among the people.