Understanding the Role of PUPN in Managing State Receivables

Oct 13, 2025 by recoveryshake.com 139 views

Coercion of Government (Bestuursdwang) in the Management of State Receivables by the State Receivable Affairs Committee (PUPN): Explore the Rules and Practices

State financial law is a crucial component of the state administration system, as emphasized by Prof. Walther Burckhardt, a Swiss law graduate, in his book "Einfuhrung in Die Rechtswissenschaft". State Finance Law regulates efforts to provide funds to carry out governmental tasks, both in the form of raw materials and money. In Indonesia, Law Number 17 of 2003 concerning State Finance regulates the rights and obligations of the State which can be valued by money. Management of state finances, including aspects of state receivables, is regulated in Government Regulation Number 49 of 1960 concerning the State Receivable Affairs Committee (PUPN).

Understanding the Role of PUPN in Managing State Receivables

PUPN is an institution that has the authority to manage state receivables, including in terms of law enforcement related to the repayment of receivables. In carrying out their duties, PUPN can use tools known as "coercion of government" or "bestuursdwang". This tool is essential in encouraging debtors to pay off their obligations to the state. The forms of government coercion applied by PUPN in managing state receivables include:

Forced Letter: A letter containing warnings and threats of further legal actions if the debtor does not pay off the debt. Confiscation of Goods and/or other assets: Actions to confiscate guaranteed goods or other property belonging to the debtor as collateral for paying off debt. Sales of Confiscated Goods through Auction Execution: Sales of confiscated goods through auction to obtain funds to pay off debtors' debt. Forced Action of the Agency (Hostage) against the Debt Insurer: The last action taken to force the debtor to pay off the debt, in the form of the detention of the debtor until the debt is paid.

The Importance of Implementing Government Coercion in Accordance with the Law

It is essential to note that the implementation of government coercion must be carried out in the corridor of law and good governance principles. That is, the action of PUPN in implementing the coercion of government must be based on the applicable law and may not conflict with human rights. The application of government coercion in the management of state receivables is a complex issue and requires careful consideration.

Additional Analysis and Explanation

The application of government coercion in the management of state receivables is a delicate matter that requires careful consideration. Here are some aspects that need to be considered:

Justice and Proportionality:* The action of coercion of government must be fair and proportional to violations committed by debtors. The application of excessive government coercion can harm the debtor and violate human rights. Transparency and Accountability: The implementation of government coercion must be carried out transparently and accountably. PUPN must provide clear and accurate information to the debtor regarding the reasons and procedures for implementing government coercion. Alternative Options: PUPN needs to explore alternative choices in completing state receivables other than through government coercion. For example, through negotiations, debt restructuring, or debt amnesty programs.

The Role of PUPN in Ensuring a Conducive Investment Climate

Government coercion is an essential tool in order to take care of state receivables and guarantee debtor compliance. However, its application must be done wisely, fairly, and in accordance with the laws and principles of good government. PUPN needs to increase transparency and accountability in the application of government coercion and explore alternative choices in completing state receivables. This is essential to create a conducive investment climate and minimize state administrative law disputes.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the coercion of government (bestuursdwang) is an essential tool in the management of state receivables by the State Receivable Affairs Committee (PUPN). However, its application must be carried out in accordance with the law and good governance principles. PUPN needs to increase transparency and accountability in the application of government coercion and explore alternative choices in completing state receivables. This is essential to create a conducive investment climate and minimize state administrative law disputes.

Recommendations for Future Research

Future research should focus on the following areas:

The impact of government coercion on debtors and the state
The effectiveness of alternative options in completing state receivables
The role of PUPN in ensuring a conducive investment climate
The need for increased transparency and accountability in the application of government coercion

By exploring these areas, researchers can gain a deeper understanding of the role of government coercion in the management of state receivables and provide recommendations for improving the system.

References

Burckhardt, W. (n.d.). Einführung in die Rechtswissenschaft. [Introduction to Law Science].
Government Regulation Number 49 of 1960 concerning the State Receivable Affairs Committee (PUPN).
Law Number 17 of 2003 concerning State Finance.

Note: The references provided are fictional and for demonstration purposes only.
Coercion of Government (Bestuursdwang) in the Management of State Receivables by the State Receivable Affairs Committee (PUPN): Q&A

In our previous article, we explored the concept of coercion of government (bestuursdwang) in the management of state receivables by the State Receivable Affairs Committee (PUPN). In this article, we will answer some of the most frequently asked questions about this topic.

Q: What is coercion of government (bestuursdwang)?

A: Coercion of government (bestuursdwang) is a sanction of state administrative law applied to stop violation of the law and return the situation to its original position. In the context of state receivables, government coercion is used to encourage debtors to pay off their obligations to the state.

Q: What are the forms of government coercion applied by PUPN?

A: The forms of government coercion applied by PUPN in managing state receivables include:

Forced Letter: A letter containing warnings and threats of further legal actions if the debtor does not pay off the debt.
Confiscation of Goods and/or other assets: Actions to confiscate guaranteed goods or other property belonging to the debtor as collateral for paying off debt.
Sales of Confiscated Goods through Auction Execution: Sales of confiscated goods through auction to obtain funds to pay off debtors' debt.
Forced Action of the Agency (Hostage) against the Debt Insurer: The last action taken to force the debtor to pay off the debt, in the form of the detention of the debtor until the debt is paid.

Q: Why is it essential to implement government coercion in accordance with the law?

A: It is essential to implement government coercion in accordance with the law to ensure that the rights of debtors are protected and that the actions of PUPN are fair and proportional to the violations committed by debtors.

Q: What are the consequences of excessive government coercion?

A: The application of excessive government coercion can harm the debtor and violate human rights. It is essential to ensure that government coercion is applied in a fair and proportional manner.

Q: What are the alternative options to government coercion in completing state receivables?

A: Alternative options to government coercion in completing state receivables include:

Negotiations: PUPN can negotiate with debtors to reach a mutually acceptable agreement.
Debt Restructuring: PUPN can restructure the debt to make it more manageable for the debtor.
Debt Amnesty Programs: PUPN can offer debt amnesty programs to encourage debtors to pay off their debts.

Q: Why is it essential to increase transparency and accountability in the application of government coercion?

A: It is essential to increase transparency and accountability in the application of government coercion to ensure that the actions of PUPN are fair and proportional to the violations committed by debtors. Transparency and accountability also help to build trust between PUPN and debtors.

Q: What is the role of PUPN in ensuring a conducive investment climate?

A: PUPN plays a crucial role in ensuring a conducive investment climate by providing a fair and transparent system for managing state receivables. This helps to build trust between investors and the government, which is essential for attracting investment.

Q: What are the benefits of implementing government coercion in accordance with the law?

A: The benefits of implementing government coercion in accordance with the law include:

Ensuring that the rights of debtors are protected
Ensuring that the actions of PUPN are fair and proportional to the violations committed by debtors
Building trust between PUPN and debtors
Ensuring a conducive investment climate

Conclusion

In conclusion, coercion of government (bestuursdwang) is an essential tool in the management of state receivables by the State Receivable Affairs Committee (PUPN). However, its application must be carried out in accordance with the law and good governance principles. PUPN needs to increase transparency and accountability in the application of government coercion and explore alternative choices in completing state receivables. This is essential to create a conducive investment climate and minimize state administrative law disputes.

Recommendations for Future Research

Future research should focus on the following areas:

The impact of government coercion on debtors and the state
The effectiveness of alternative options in completing state receivables
The role of PUPN in ensuring a conducive investment climate
The need for increased transparency and accountability in the application of government coercion

By exploring these areas, researchers can gain a deeper understanding of the role of government coercion in the management of state receivables and provide recommendations for improving the system.

References

Burckhardt, W. (n.d.). Einführung in die Rechtswissenschaft. [Introduction to Law Science].
Government Regulation Number 49 of 1960 concerning the State Receivable Affairs Committee (PUPN).
Law Number 17 of 2003 concerning State Finance.